Security · GS3.8 · 2026-10-25 · 2 min read · 2026-10-25-pm
Jaishankar Condemns Terrorism as an Instrument of Statecraft
External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar stated on October 25, 2026, that using terrorism as a tool by states is unacceptable and unjustifiable. This statement is important for UPSC aspirants as it highlights India's stance on terrorism in the context of internal security and international diplomacy.
Jaishankar emphasized that terrorism as state policy is unacceptable and calls for global unity against it.
Why is this in the news?
On October 25, 2026, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar condemned the use of terrorism as an instrument of statecraft during an event marking the 75th anniversary of Chinmaya Mission in New Delhi.
What did Jaishankar say about terrorism as statecraft?
- Unacceptable practice. Jaishankar said that using terrorism as an instrument of statecraft is simply unacceptable and can never be justified or rationalised.
- Continued due to tolerance. He noted terrorism persists because not all states show zero tolerance, and some prioritize political calculations over countering terrorism.
- Global call for unity. He urged the world to develop sharper awareness of terrorism as a common threat and to come together with stronger resolve to counter it in all forms.
Why does this statement matter for UPSC aspirants?
- Internal security relevance. The statement relates to internal security by addressing terrorism, a major threat to peace and stability.
- Foreign policy context. It reflects India's diplomatic position on terrorism amid ongoing global conflicts like those in Ukraine and West Asia.
- Exam linkage. Understanding India's stance on terrorism helps in answering questions on internal security, international relations, and counter-terrorism policies.
Back to basics: Terrorism as a security threat
Terrorism involves unlawful acts of violence to create fear and achieve political aims. When states use terrorism as a tool, it complicates international relations and security. Counter-terrorism requires cooperation among nations to uphold peace and stability.
Practice: MCQ, Mains and revision
Prelims MCQ
Consider the following statements about External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar's remarks on terrorism: 1. He stated that terrorism as an instrument of statecraft is unacceptable and unjustifiable. 2. He named specific countries that support terrorism in his speech. Which of the statements is/are correct?
- 1 only
- 2 only
- Both 1 and 2
- Neither 1 nor 2
Answer and trap
Answer: (a). Statement 2 is incorrect because Jaishankar did not name any country in his remarks.
Mains question (15 marks)
Examine the implications of using terrorism as an instrument of statecraft in the context of India's internal security and foreign policy.
Examine: Analyze how state-sponsored terrorism affects India's security and diplomatic relations.
Intro: Define terrorism as an instrument of statecraft and its relevance to India.
- Explain Jaishankar's condemnation of terrorism as unacceptable and unjustifiable.
- Discuss the challenges posed by states that tolerate or support terrorism for political reasons.
- Analyze the impact on India's internal security and the need for global cooperation.
- Highlight India's diplomatic stance advocating dialogue and diplomacy over conflict.
Conclusion: Summarize the need for zero tolerance and international resolve against terrorism.
Quick revision
- What did Jaishankar say about terrorism as a tool of statecraft?
- He said it is simply unacceptable and can never be justified or rationalised.
- Why does terrorism continue according to Jaishankar?
- Because not all states display zero tolerance and some prioritize political calculations.
- What solution did Jaishankar propose for conflicts and terrorism?
- He asserted that dialogue and diplomacy are the only solutions.
Sources
- [1] The Hindu: Usage of terrorism as instrument of statecraft simply unacceptable: Jaishankar · 2026-10-25 · newspaper